Today’s video is all about the underhanded tactics of the egg industry in the United States. For decades, the American egg industry battled and continues to battle anyone who dares to say anything even slightly negative about eggs, especially if these statements are backed by credible scientific proof.
Now that we have that out of the way, let’s delve into The Great Egg Conspiracy: Lies, Corruption & Kevin Bacon. A Bite Size Vegan Egg-spose. [tweet this] [I knew that last one was too much…]
Due to the nature of this video post and the remarkably aggressive and underhanded behavior of the egg industry, which I will be highlighting today, I feel it’s prudent to start off with a little bit of this:
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, parody, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Filing a false DMCA claim is a felony in the United States.
This is the first video in a series I’ll be releasing on eggs. In later videos, I’ll discuss the health debate surrounding eggs and the ethical issue surrounding egg production. Be sure to subscribe so you don’t miss those. If you’d like a brief overview on eggs, you can check out my video on eggs for kids.
Today I’m going to lead you through some of these exchanges, which range from completely absurd and nonsensical pseudoscience to illegal and aggressive corporate sabotage, all the way to outright threats of physical violence. For citations to all the documents and studies I’ll be referencing, check out the resources below.
The birth of the National Commission on Egg Nutrition
Our journey into the egg controversy begins in 1961 when the American Heart Association took a stand on the association between dietary cholesterol and heart disease–namely that there was an association.  In response to this devastating news, the egg industry formed the almost impartial-sounding National Commission on Egg Nutrition in order to fight theses claims in the most American of ways: by launching a massive advertising campaign.
The Wall Street Journal and many other media outlets, sported ads combating the “theory of saturated fat and cholesterol” with claims such as “there is absolutely no scientific evidence that eating eggs, even in quantity, in any way increases the risk of heart disease.”
Click to enlarge
The AHA responded by complaining to the Federal Trade Commission about what they called “false, deceptive and misleading advertising.” [tweet this] After considering both sides, the FTC filed a formal complaint against the Commission on Egg Nutrition and its ad agency. 
The Commission on Egg Nutrition then lawyered up but were told by their own lawyers that the “chances of beating the lawsuit on scientific grounds are almost nil.” 
In the 1976 FTC decision, the judge called the Commission on Egg Nutrition’s statements “false, misleading, deceptive and unfair.” 
From The 1976 FTC Decision  Click to enlarge
The decision said that egg advertisement claims such “there is competent and reliable scientific evidence that dietary cholesterol, including eggs, decreases the risk of heart disease” [2 p.95-96] and that “the human body eliminates the same amount of cholesterol as that eaten,”[2 p.95-96] were untrue.
Click to enlarge
The judge also pointed out that the name National Commission on Egg Nutrition implies an “impartial, independent, quasi-governmental health commission” when in fact it is “an association of persons engaged in the egg industry.” 
The Commission on Egg Nutrition argued that making false claims is within their rights of free speech, but were unable to convince the FTC, the court, or even their own lawyers. So again they took the most American of routes and set out to dupe the American public by paying for scientific studies that would reveal the cholesterol in eggs to be harmless. 
In reviewing such “scientific” literature, nutrition expert Dr. John McDougall pointed out that “Of the six studies in the medical literature that fail to demonstrate a significant rise in blood cholesterol level with the consumption of whole eggs, three were paid for by the American Egg Board, one by the Missouri Egg Merchandising Council, and one by the Egg Program of the California Department of Agriculture. Support for the sixth paper was not identified.” And that “The trick is in knowing how to design your experiment so you will get the results you are looking for. To get little or no increase in cholesterol results, you first saturate your subjects with cholesterol from other sources, because studies show that once people consume more than 400 to 800 milligrams of cholesterol per day, additional cholesterol has only a minor effect on blood cholesterol levels… Well-designed studies by investigators, independent of the food industry, clearly demonstrate the detrimental effects of eggs on blood cholesterol levels.” 
Sure enough, non-egg-industry-financed studies consistently showed that dietary cholesterol is harmful to our health.
The dietary cholesterol-blood cholesterol link 
Click to enlarge
Which, of course, the Egg industry found less than egg-ceptional. (Just wanted to see if you were still paying attention…) because it only gets better from here!
The American Egg Board and the Lies It Told
In a moment of virtually edible incredibleness, in 1976 the egg industry birthed from its collective cloaca the American Egg Board, whose mission, according to their website is to “allow egg producers to fund to carry out proactive programs to increase demand for eggs and egg products through research, education and promotion.” And yes, that is a direct quote. 
The (nonsensical) Egg Board mission statement
Click to enlarge
Around this time, our little engine that could, the American egg industry, continued their efforts to disprove the wicked cholesterol conspiracy. The United States Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, known as the McGovern Committee after its chairman, was originally formed to address concerns about hunger and malnutrition in the United States but expanded in 1974 to include national nutrition policy and go after the major killers of overnutrition, with heart disease leading the pack.  Needless to say, the egg industry was concerned.
In an effort to clear its besmirched name, the industry presented five studies they felt completely redeemed eggs as a viable nutrition source. McGovern found the studies so confounding that he asked the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute to review them. As John Robbins reports in his groundbreaking book Diet for a New America, “The institute carefully examined each of the five studies, then reported to Congress that the studies seemed deliberately designed to distort the facts. The institute’s impartial appraisal was that the studies were ‘seriously flawed…meaningless and should be discarded.’” 
But don’t worry—our little underdog fighting against Big Government didn’t give up. They again showed their true American colors by launching yet another advertising campaign, this time armed with “scientific evidence” based on these five studies, which had just been completely disproved.
(I’m sorry…I’m just so proud to be an American right now…)
Back to our unsung hero, who continued to claim dietary cholesterol is an essential nutrient and that our bodies naturally lowers their cholesterol production in response to higher dietary cholesterol consumption. To back up this last claim, the egg industry cited outdated cholesterol studies, which used isolated cholesterol crystals before it was known that our bodies don’t absorb cholesterol without the presence of dietary fat. But who needs valid, up-to-date science when you have the results you want?
Sadly for the egg industry, prevailing experts like Dr. Robert Levy, Director Of The National Heart, Lung And Blood Institute at the time, stated that “As far as we can determine, all of us would do just as well if we had no cholesterol in our diet. Cholesterol can be made by all of the cells in the body so we don’t need to take in any.”  And other experts such as the Task Force To The American Society Of Clinical Nutrition, stated that “There is no known evidence that low-cholesterol diets are harmful, or that dietary cholesterol is an essential nutrient in any human condition.,”  John Robbins, in Diet for a New America wrote that, “Under court order, the egg industry finally had to stop running ads that represented cholesterol as an essential dietary nutrient. And the court told them once again to stop denying the link between cholesterol and heart disease.”[9 p. 205]
But fear not. Such lies would never sway our steadfast egg industry heroes. If you can’t find an expert to tout the wonders of your product, you can always buy one, right? The executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Michael Jacobson, stated, “in June 1980, a committee of the National Academy of Sciences issued a report defending the current fatty diet. The main authors of the report were professors who had for many years received grants from or were paid consultants to the National Dairy Council, the National Livestock and Meat Board, the American Egg Board… and other industries whose profits depend on Americans’ pathogenic diet. One such professor was quoted in the press as being surprised that people thought the $250,000.00 he received as a consultant to the egg and other industries would cloud his objectivity regarding the nutritional value of eggs.” 
In 2012, the egg industry found itself in a bind once more when a study arose comparing atherosclerosis in smokers and egg-eaters finding that those who ate the most eggs had as much as two-thirds the risk of those that smoked the most, the equivalent of a pack-a-day habit for 40 years or more. 
Internal memos retrieved by the Freedom of Information Act and highlighted by the nutrition powerhouse himself, Dr. Michael Greger of Nutritionfacts.org, reveal the egg industry tried to pay scientists to speak against this study. When they were unable to find a scientist willing to refute the study, a miracle occurred. An email from an MD, PhD, MBA, or “Doctor Doctor” as Dr. Greger says, discredited the study. Yet when the study’s principle investigator responded, they found out that this doctor didn’t exist and the email had come from a hacked email account of someone who’d been on vacation.
As we’ve seen so far, the unflappable egg industry doesn’t let something as trivial as the truth get in its way. [tweet this] In 2006, thirty years after being told by the FTC to stop making false claims, the egg industry was still at it. Internal documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and again highlighted by Dr. Greger, showed the egg industry drafted a letter to magazines claiming that “the American Heart Association changed its recommendations to approve an egg a day in 2000 and eventually eliminated its number restrictions on eggs in 2002.”
False claims by the egg industry. [full emails, citation 37]
Click to enlarge
Dr. Greger produced a response from the head of the USDA’s poultry research and promotion program qualifying that the recommendations never changed. What actually happened was, in response to a question posed by a planted audience member, the AHA had acknowledged that a single egg could technically fit under the 300mg a day total cholesterol limit set for individuals with normal cholesterol levels, if you then eliminated all other forms of cholesterol from your diet.
USDA letter confirming that cholesterol standards haven't changed [full emails, citation 37]
Click to enlarge
You see, a single egg contains 213-275mg, which is actually over the 200mg per day limit for people with high cholesterol.  As an interesting point of comparison, KFC’s Double Down Sandwich, which features two chicken breasts, bacon, processed cheese and a dollop of KFC's special “Colonel's Sauce” contains 150mg cholesterol, 63-125mg less than a single egg.  [tweet this]
The most recent display of tenacity, ingenuity and total balls-out brazenness on the part of the egg industry is the attack on Hampton Creek, formally Beyond Eggs, makers of Just Mayo and other plant-based foods.
The Battle on Eggless Mayonnaise
In a two-year battle during which the they violated no less than five laws, the Egg Board pulled out all the stops to take down what they saw as a “crisis and major threat”: eggless mayonnaise. 
Eggless Mayonnaise is a “crisis and a major threat”
Click to enlarge
The American Egg Board went for a multi-prong attack. In December 2013, they reached out to Anthony Zolezzi, an external sustainability contractor and self-proclaimed “eco-entrepreneur,” who’d said he could have Whole Foods refuse to sell Hampton Creek’s Just Mayo. It would only take a single phone call. And, of course, an implied fee.
Click to enlarge
When they failed to stop Whole Foods from carrying Just Mayo, the American Egg Board went to phase two with the help of the USDA. In January 2014, Roger Glasshoff of the USDA proposed to report Just Mayo to the FDA for a false labeling claim. The FDA issued a warning letter  to Hampton Creek about misleading consumers by using the term “mayo” and the image of an egg while their product did not actually contain eggs. Because that’s the most misleading advertising we’ve come across so far.
Just Mayo (Source: paddockpost.com)
To continue their full-frontal egg-sault (that’s the last one for real) the American Egg Board hired Edelman, the world’s largest crisis management firm to lead a campaign against Hampton Creek with the USDA approving the key messages. They budgeted $33,000 to pay popular food bloggers for positive pieces on the wonders of eggs.
Click to enlarge
Because the union of a massive government-backed group and a multi-billion dollar corporation is far better than either on their own, the American Egg Board backed Unilever, the maker of Hellmann’s mayonnaise in the suit they filed against Hampton Creek on October 31, 2014,  again for the product not actually containing eggs, thus violating the United States’ federal standard of mayo. Because in this country, we have principles. Sadly, due to overwhelmingly bad press, Unilever dropped the suit two months later. 
But as we know by now, the egg industry is never one to say “well, we did our best, let’s move on.” In the grand finale of their ingenuously-crafted multi-prong attack, they whipped out their most carefully crafted weapon yet: flippant threats of violence and murder. [tweet this]
Both Mike Spencer, Executive Vice President at Hidden Villa Ranch, a Hampton Creek Competitor, and Mitch Kanter, the Executive Directore of the American Egg Board’s Egg Nutrition Center, joked about putting out a hit on Hampton Creek’s CEO.
Threats of violence to Hampton Creek's CEO 
Click to enlarge
So let’s say, just for argument’s sake, that cholesterol in eggs isn’t bad for you and that consuming them won’t kill you. Well, apparently, creating plant-based alternative to them just might.
Thus ends the two-year epic of Big Egg vs. Hampton Creek. Or so we hope.
Interestingly enough, while the American Egg Board and USDA project a unified front in public, behind the scenes, even the USDA has to try and reign in the apparently boundless cojones of the egg industry.
In another juicy exchange unearthed by the Freedom of Information Act and phenomenally documented by Dr. Greger in a video , we see the egg industry trying to create advertisements with American Egg Board money. You see, when an egg company wants to create an ad, they can do so with their own funds and say absolutely whatever they want, or they can dip into the expansive advertising budget of the American Egg Board, but then be subject to the USDA’s regulations. Now keep in mind that the USDA has a vested interest in marketing eggs and basically has a bromance with the American Egg Board, yet still has to put its foot down on the over-zealous egg industry’s penchant for untrue claims.
Wordplay and False Advertising
In this fascinating and somewhat comical email exchange, the USDA repeatedly tells the egg industry that they cannot legally call eggs “healthy” as the official FDA rules for the term “healthy” require that a food have saturated fat levels of 1g or less per 100g, less than 10% calories from saturated fat and that 90mg or less of cholesterol per serving, which even half an egg fails. 
Click to enlarge
Legally, eggs can’t be called nutritious, but can be called “nutrient-dense” as there is no legal definition for “nutrient-dense”. But as Dr. Greger says, even Twinkies can be called “nutrient-dense.” Eggs can’t be portrayed as a diet food because of their saturated fat and cholesterol content, plus they contain twice the calories of anything that can be “low cal.” Eggs can’t be called “relatively low in calories,” “low in sat fat,” or “relatively low in fat.” Eggs can’t even be called “a protein-rich food.” It’s illegal to say they “contribute nutritionally,” are “healthful” or even “contribute healthful components.” They can’t say eggs are “good for you” or an “important part of well-balanced, healthy diet.” Or even “safe.” [Tweet this]
Yes, it’s illegal to say eggs are safe, with more than a hundred thousand Americans poisoned by Salmonella every year from eggs. The American Egg Board can’t even mention anything but hardboiled and dried eggs as even their own research shows that sunny-side-up, over-easy, and scrambled eggs are unsafe. 
Click to enlarge
It’s particularly interesting to read some of the USDA’s notes like: [you] “can’t use the word ‘healthy’ because of the amount of cholesterol (risk-increasing nutrient) in eggs,”  They are literally identifying cholesterol as a risk-increasing nutrient, yet the 2015 USDA New Dietary Recommendations Committee is proposing to remove any cholesterol limitation from official guidelines, something we’ll cover in detail in the health-focused egg video.
The USDA also encourages crafty thinking. When told they can’t say eggs “aid in weight loss,” the egg industry instead tried “can reduce hunger,” with the USDA’s shining approval of their clever use of semantics. Because food that reduces hunger is a crowning achievement of agricultural engineering.
With all of this wordplay, it seems only natural that the American Egg Board decided to really bring home the bacon. Kevin Bacon. If you notice in the ad, Mr. Bacon mentions that an “egg contains 6g high quality protein,” to “keep you fuller longer” and “help you stay energized all morning.”  He doesn’t say “healthy” or “nutritious,” but is certain to mention it help you say full. And with all that fat and cholesterol it better! The interesting part is that Bacon does say “Are you ready to start eating a nutritional powerhouse of a breakfast?”–the very term that was formerly disapproved by the USDA in the email exchange. So either the USDA has relaxed its standards, or this was allowed because he technically doesn’t say that eggs are a nutritional powerhouse of a breakfast, but rather simply asks the woman if she is ready for a breakfast that is. [tweet this]
Hats off to you, American Egg Board. Way to step around those cholesterol-laden mines and give the American public what they want: a celebrity pimping a food the public loves, which has been shown time and again to contribute to our nation’s number one killer. Way to telling the good public how healthy they are being by continuing to consume your misunderstood gem of a product. Seeing as how you’ve paid professors, scientists, and executives to manipulate and misrepresent facts and spent billions on fierce advertising campaigns backed by thoroughly disproved science, it really makes sense to step it up to a high-name celebrity, who I’m sure performed for a nominal fee. Government-regulated dollars hard at work! Though, to your credit, this time you did use them to promote eggs, as is your mission, rather than fund illegal attacks on competitors or corrupt studies based on junk-science. Way to go, really. Now all you need is actual facts.
Believe it or not, this video is but a peek into the underbelly of food industry in America. The meat, dairy and egg industries have enormous sway in our government, our dietary guidelines, school nutrition education, and so many other far-reaching facets of our society.
I hope that this has been informative and illuminating. The time it to produce this video clocks in at around 83 hours. If you’d like to help support Bite Size Vegan so I can keep putting in the long hours to bring you this educational resources, please check out the support page where you can give a one-time donation or receive perks and rewards for your support by joining the Nugget Army.
Please share this video post around to spread the truth. I’d love to hear your thoughts on this egg industry egg-spose. (That’s it for real.) Let me know in the comments!
Resources and citations
1] Dietary Fat and Its Relation to Heart Attacks and Strokes Report by the Central Committee For Medical And Community Program of the American Heart Associatio
2] The 1976 FTC Decision, includes copies of some of the NCEN's ad campaigns
5] Egg yolk consumption and carotid plaque, by J. David Spence, David J.A. Jenkins, Jean Davignon, Atherosclerosis October 2012 Volume 224, Issue 2, Pages 469–473.
6] The American Egg Board About Page [as viewed 9/5/15]
7] Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health (2nd ed.) by Nestle, Marion, pp. 38–42.
8] Toward an End to Hunger in America by Peter K.Eisinge, pp. 78–83, 85.
10] U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, “Diet Related to Killer Diseases, Volume 6, Response Regarding Eggs,” hearing July 26, 1977.
11] Task Force to the American Society of Clinical Nutrition, quoted in Hausman, Jack Sprat’s Legacy, 93– 94.
13] Michael Jacobson, preface to Hausman, Jack Sprat’s Legacy, 13– 19.
16] Dietary cholesterol and egg yolks: Not for patients at risk of vascular disease J David Spence, MD, David JA Jenkins, MD, PhD, and Jean Davignon, MD, MSc, The Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2010 Nov; 26(9): e336–e339.
20] Validation of cooking methods using shell eggs inoculated with Salmonella serotypes Enteritidis and Heidelberg. Davis AL1, Curtis PA, Conner DE, McKee SR, Kerth LK.
22] J. Mayer, “Egg vs. Cholesterol Battle,” New York Daily News, October 9, 1974, 48.
23] The McDougall Plan by John McDougall and Mary Ann McDougall, pp. 56.
24] “Human plasma lipid responses to red meat, poultry, fish, and eggs.” O'Brien BC, Reiser R., American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34 (1980)
25] “Does Egg Feeding (i.e. Dietary Cholesterol) Affect Plasma Cholesterol Levels in Humans? The Results of a Double Blind Study,” S. Roberts, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34 (1981): 2092;
26] “Dietary cholesterol and the plasma lipids and lipoproteins in the Tarahumara Indians: a people habituated to a low cholesterol diet after weaning.,” M. McMurry, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1982 35: 741-4
27] “Effect of Dietary Cholesterol on Serum Cholesterol in Man,”F. Mattson, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 25 (1972): 589.
28] Robert Levy, quoted in Hausman, Jack Sprat’s Legacy, 215.
32] “Effect of Dietary Egg on Human Serum Cholesterol and Triglycerides,” M. Flynn, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32 (1979): 1051;
33] “Plasma Cholesterol and Triglycerides in Men with Added Eggs in the Diet,” G. Slater, Nutrition Reports International 14 (1976): 249;
34] “Eggs, Serum Cholesterol, and Coronary Heart Disease,” T. Dawber, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 36 (1982): 617;
35] “Effect of Dietary Egg on Serum Cholesterol and Triglyceride of Human Males,” M. Porter, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 30 (1977): 490;
36] “Plasma lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in adult males consuming normal and high cholesterol diets under controlled conditions.” E. Flaim, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34 (1981): 1103.
37] Full Email Exchange Between the USDA and Egg Industry Regarding Advertising Phrasing retrieved through the Freedom of Information Act via Dr. Greger of Nutritionfacts.org [see citation 15 for his video on the matter]
38] Egg Cholesterol in the Diet by Dr. Michael Greger
39] Eggs worse than KFC Double Down by Debora van Brenk [news item but referring to study in citation 16]